Uncategorized

Brothers accused of assaulting police officer at Manchester Airport will not face third trial

Mohammed Fahir Amaaz, 21, has been in custody since last year after he was convicted at the first trial of assaulting two female officers and a member of the public.

Muhammed Amaad (left) and Mohammed Fahir Amaaz, pictured in February 2025. File pic: PA
Image:Muhammed Amaad (left) and Mohammed Fahir Amaaz, pictured in February 2025. File pic: PA

Two brothers accused of assaulting a police officer at Manchester Airport will not face a third trial.

Prosecutors claimed Mohammed Fahir Amaaz, 21, and Muhammad Amaad, 26, attacked Zachary Marsden on 23 July 2024.

Footage of the incident went viral on social media.

Both denied causing actual bodily harm to officer PC Marsden, 26, telling Liverpool Crown Court that they acted in self-defence, or in defence of each other.

After two separate juries failed to reach verdicts, prosecutors said they would not pursue a third trial because of a “presumption” they are only held in “exceptional circumstances”.

“The Crown’s assessment is that while the count on the indictment is serious and the case has attracted significant public interest, it cannot be properly described as one of extreme gravity,” said prosecutor Paul Greaney KC.

Muhammad Amaad outside Liverpool Crown Court. Pic: PA
Image:Muhammad Amaad outside Liverpool Crown Court. Pic: PA

He said the decision had been deliberated at the “highest level” of the Crown Prosecution Service.

Last week, the second jury was discharged after it deliberated for nearly 20 hours following a five-week trial, and on Friday the judge ordered not-guilty verdicts be recorded.

Amaaz has been in custody since he was convicted at last year’s first trial of assaulting PCs Lydia Ward and Ellie Cook during the same incident, as well as attacking a member of the public.

Mohammed Fahir Amaaz, previously convicted of assaulting PCs Lydia Ward and Ellie Cook. File pic: GMP
Image:Mohammed Fahir Amaaz, previously convicted of assaulting PCs Lydia Ward and Ellie Cook. File pic: GMP

He will be sentenced on 26 June, but his brother, who faced the single allegation, walked free from court.

The first trial heard that police were called after Amaaz headbutted a man in Starbucks.

He claimed the man had racially abused his mother – who they were at the airport to collect – on an aircraft.

See more Sky News in Google

Google users can see more from their preferred sources in search results – click here to make yours Sky News

The Crown said Amaaz resisted their attempts to take him outside, and Amaad then intervened.

A police watchdog probe into the actions of PC Marsden and other Greater Manchester Police (GMP) officers remains ongoing.

The court previously heard that the defendants, from Rochdale, had an elder brother who served with GMP, as well as five cousins.

LEAVE A RESPONSE

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Uncategorized

LIVE TV BLOODBATH! ZIA YUSUF GOES NUCLEAR ON THE BBC! Reform UK’s rising star just turned a “trap” interview into a total media execution! Zia Yusuf didn’t just defend his party—he accused the BBC of BLATANT bias and “selective memory” while the cameras were rolling! The studio turned into a war zone when the host brought up candidate scandals, but Yusuf had a lethal counter-punch ready. He exposed a massive, UNREPORTED Green Party scandal that the BBC allegedly buried to protect the “Net Zero” agenda… See details in the first comment 👇Reform UK’s rising star just turned a “trap” interview into a total media execution! 😱 Zia Yusuf didn’t just defend his party—he accused the BBC of BLATANT bias and “selective memory” while the cameras were rolling! A political firestorm erupted on live television as Reform UK’s Zia Yusuf delivered a scorching indictment of the BBC, accusing the broadcaster of blatant bias and selective reporting during a tense interview. The clash centered on the party’s policies and candidate vetting, but escalated into a direct confrontation over media integrity. Yusuf, appearing on the BBC, faced immediate questioning over a Reform prize draw offering to pay a street’s energy bills. The host suggested the draw was primarily a data-gathering exercise, a claim Yusuf forcefully rejected. He defended the initiative as a legitimate method to highlight the party’s core energy policy pledges. The Reform figure outlined sweeping proposals to address the cost-of-living crisis, including the complete abolition of VAT on home energy bills and the removal of green levies. He pledged to slash fuel duty, aiming to cut petrol and diesel prices significantly. Yusuf framed these measures as urgent relief for struggling households. When pressed on how to fund the estimated £2.5 billion cost of removing VAT, Yusuf pointed to cutting subsidies. He specifically targeted electric vehicle grants, heat pump subsidies, and carbon capture projects, labeling them an “insane experiment” that misallocates taxpayer money. The interview turned contentious as the host challenged the potential job losses in green industries. Yusuf argued that current subsidies primarily benefit Chinese manufacturing and that net-zero policies have cost more jobs than they have created. He stated Reform supports renewables only when they are economically viable without public subsidy. The confrontation reached its peak when discussion turned to recent controversies involving Reform candidates. The host cited instances of offensive remarks and a Nazi salute photograph, suggesting the party’s vetting process had failed. Yusuf acknowledged issues but presented a staunch defense. Yusuf pivoted to a counterattack, accusing the BBC of disproportionate coverage of Reform’s missteps while ignoring more severe incidents from other parties. He cited a specific, unreported example of alleged anti-Semitic comments made by Green Party activists just days prior. “The BBC pounces on every single Reform mishap and gives it vastly disproportionate coverage,” Yusuf stated, his tone sharp with accusation. He claimed the broadcaster completely ignores “far more voluminous misdemeanor and frankly egregious things” from other political groups. His accusation that the BBC failed to report on the Green Party incident was met with interruption, but Yusuf held his ground. He concluded the point by stating such selective reporting was “unbecoming of the BBC,” delivering a direct challenge to the broadcaster’s impartiality. The interview laid bare deepening tensions between Reform UK and the established media. Yusuf’s performance is likely to galvanize supporters who share his view of institutional bias, while critics will scrutinize his policy costings and defense of the party’s candidate selection. This explosive exchange guarantees that media bias will remain a central theme in Reform’s campaign strategy. The party is positioning itself not just against political rivals, but against what it frames as a hostile media landscape, setting the stage for further incendiary clashes as the election cycle intensifies.